NEW UFO LAW, ALIENS EXIST BUT REMAIN ON THE SIDELINES - YET IT'S ALL ABOUT MONEY



Joe Biden has signed into law a bill that verbatim mentions 'technologies of unknown origin and non-human intelligence', and prominent lawmakers are pushing for ever more urgent disclosure of UFOs and the truth about Extraterrestrial visitation.

But something unexpected has triggered highly revealing events about what goes on behind the scenes. Is the Truth out there? Today, more than ever, we can say that the Truth is among us, and in an increasingly obvious way.

Until a few weeks ago, 2023 seemed to be a very important year in terms of so-called “official disclosure”. New offices of analysis and investigation were set up, special government websites were created, important legislation was discussed, many documentaries and videos were released, but above all many hearings were held.

So much so that many thought that this year would finally bring full disclosure, that the US government would come clean and reveal what it has been hiding for decades about UFOs and Extraterrestrial Reality.

But this has not happened. Although many sensational claims have been made which, if taken seriously and investigated, would indeed have caused an ontological shock and a rethinking of our place in the universe. It is a pity that, in the end, none of them were substantiated by much more than hearsay. As is the tradition after all.

It all started on 12 January, when the Pentagon's Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released the long-awaited “2022 Annual Report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena”. The report, produced by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) established in July 2022, contained more than 500 reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), a new term used to describe unidentified phenomena (or rather, objects) moving through the air, underwater and in space.

CLICK to view the document

The long-awaited report analysed these sightings and concluded that 171 remained unidentified and that some had particularly unusual flight characteristics or performance capabilities.

All of this culminated in the recent testimony of David Grush, the 36-year-old former intelligence officer and retired Air Force officer, who stated under oath before the US Congress that the US government and its military subcontractors have multiple alien craft and bodies in their possession.

David Grusch

He further stated that the US began collecting these vessels in the 1940s and has been studying them ever since, denying their existence to the public. He added that the CIA was actively involved in the recovery of the UAP materials. 

Just as some anonymous sources have recently reported the existence of a special CIA office that has been coordinating the recovery of crashed or abandoned UAPs of “non-human” origin for decades. 


Curiously, in the early 1950s the CIA developed and implemented a broad government-wide policy of debunking all UAP sightings, no matter how credible, with the clear aim of reducing public interest in flying saucers.

As reported in a remarkable 1971 document written by the then head of the nuclear branch of Australia's Joint Intelligence Organisation, which only deepens the mystery of the CIA's possible involvement with UAPs.


The report claims that the same CIA division mentioned above, then called the Office of Scientific Intelligence, "studied UFO reports with the intention of determining UFO propulsion methods". With Congress now being accused of dealing with undeclared UAP reverse-engineering programmes, the document makes for particularly interesting reading.

In short, decades of lies and cover-ups that are now angering not only the people, but also some important political and governmental figures.

So much so that Congress, having stated that it has good reason to believe that the executive branch has withheld information on UFOs that should be made public, and following Grush's testimony, through Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds, proposed the "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2023", which would outline a very interesting path for disclosure.

On the left Chuck Schumer, on the right Mike Rounds

It is a pity that the amendment was trimmed of genuinely attractive proposals for UAP disclosure before it could reach the hands of the US President and thus be officially included in the annual defence spending bill, the National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA).


There is indeed a real battle going on in the halls of the US Congress over what and how to disclose the so-called UAP phenomenology, although the amendment proposed by Schumer was the result of a bipartisan proposal. But apparently there are very significant conflicts of interest that limit any good initiative in this regard.

On the one hand, there are whistleblowers and former senior intelligence officials who claim to have knowledge of a secret programme to recover crashed flying saucers and alien occupants. And also prominent lawmakers such as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Marco Rubio and Senate Armed Services Committee Member Mike Rounds, who strongly supported the ruduced amendment before it became law.

On the other hand, there is the $112 billion defence contractor Lockheed Martin, which has been funding two powerful House Republicans with several thousand dollars for at least a decade. They are Mike Turner, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

On the left Mike Turner, on the right Mike Rogers


In fact, attorney and UFO transparency activist Daniel Sheehan, who was consulted on the Schumer amendment, told DailyMail.com that the two lawmakers were under the control of defence contractors and therefore opposed to the bill. They had to keep the secrets of military bases in their districts secret.


Daniel Sheehan

“They're both from the districts where the technology is being worked on,” Sheehan said. “Turner is from the 10th congressional district in Ohio, which includes Wright Patterson Air Force Base, and we know that's where the technology was taken back in 1947 from Roswell.”

“In particular, the defence contractor Lockheed Martin was uptight about wanting to maintain not only physical control of the materials, but to have patent rights. That's what they were really into, because that's where their money is.”

“If they could get a patent on, for example, anti-gravity systems, that's trillions of dollars in the future.”

Even the late Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who was a member of the “Gang of Eight”, a select group of prominent lawmakers granted access to the country's most closely guarded secrets, named Lockheed Martin as one of the private contractors holding potentially alien scrap metal in an interview with The New Yorker in 2021.

As the recent revelations made during the Congressional hearing prompted by David Grush's startling revelations. Here we have whistleblowers claiming under oath that some government agencies are in possession of crashed UAPs and that some are held by private contractors such as Lockheed Martin.

Or there is an email exchange between established filmmaker James Fox of 'The Phenomenon', an interesting 2020 documentary about UAPs. 

James Fox was interviewed some time ago by John Podesta, former White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton and a long-time advocate of government transparency on UFOs. On that occasion, John P. asked Fox which private companies, according to his sources, might be directly involved in the illegal recovery of UFOs, given the director's direct access to very powerful people.

On the left John Podesta, on the right James Fox


"I have heard from Lockheed Martin, Boeing and the other company, Raytheon," Fox replied. "My emails seeking comment from Boeing and Raytheon, two giants in the industry, received no response. But a spokesman for Lockheed Martin, also one of the largest aerospace and defence companies on the planet, neither denied nor confirmed possession of extraterrestrial assets when I asked about it."

"It would be better to have these questions about UAPs answered by the US government," the Lockheed Martin spokesman is reported to have said in an emailed response to a list of questions formulated by the director.

Or we have Dr Garry Nolan, a Stanford University professor, Nobel Prize nominee no less, and eminent ufologist who has consulted for the CIA and defence contractors, who has actually had the opportunity to analyse fragments found at UFO crash sites that the US government had given to outside contractors such as Lockheed Martin and McDonnell Douglas to study.


In fact, we understand it even better by analysing the data from OpenSecrets.

OpenSecrets is America's leading nonpartisan, independent, non-profit research group that monitors money in US politics and its effect on elections and public policy, providing data and analysis for the benefit of the people.


In fact, the reports show that Lockheed spent more than $19 million on lobbying last year alone and proved to be Rogers and Turner's biggest donor. In fact, over the past 10 years it has donated $100,750 to Rogers' campaigns and $85,000 to his PAC staff (a Political Action Committee, or PAC, is a committee in the US and Canada that raises money from its members to make donations to support or defeat candidates, referendums or legislative initiatives). For Turner, there is $145,050 from 2013 and $55,000 for his PAC staff.


Contribution Report Year 2022 - GO TO REPORTS

It has been reported that among the issues Lockheed lobbyists coincidentally raised with lawmakers was the annual NDAA defence bill.

Even 2023, in short, turned out to be an abject failure in terms of “official disclosure”. But why, in spite of a thousand exposes, major documentary releases, public hearings, does this kind of 'invisible hand' always persist, holding back the truth about UFOs and extraterrestrial reality from the height of its seemingly great omnipotence? I mean, we have seen what happened with the Schumer Amendment and we have read the reports, the testimonies of very credible people and the figures. And we all know that there is almost always a “follow-the-money” component to most cover-ups. So why assume the opposite with UFOs? Of course, we could say that it is all about power, technological and military superiority, control of the masses, but I invite you to make an important reflection. Don't all these factors also depend on money? Giovanni Falcone said it some time ago: “Follow the money and you will find corruption”. We find it in the Bible in Revelation 13,16,”And it makes everyone—small and great, rich and poor, free and slave—to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead”. Well, money is on our minds 24 hours a day, influencing every decision we make that originates in the frontal lobe of our brain, the area of logic and rationality. From thought to action, through the hand, which transforms thoughts and ideas into practical actions. So why should we be surprised? Forget evolution, knowledge, technological or ethical-moral development. Money makes you lonely, they say, and in this case in the universe too, and so, it seems, it will have to be until man, or someone from other worlds, decides to change the cards for good.

Vain words, of course, when spoken by a nobody like me. But what can one say when they are confirmed by the very authors of such shady cover-ups? Perhaps someone has forgotten the shocking revelations made by the Financial Times last year?

CLICK TO VIEW THE ARTICLE

Well, the well-known British newspaper specialising in financial reporting and analysis of current economic affairs, the leading business publication, has claimed that the financial risk associated with UFOs is greater than the risk of a potential Western confrontation with China or Russia. "None of these," it argued, "has the potential to shake up markets in the way that a big 'not-know unknown' suddenly becomes a ‘known unknown’".

Indeed, according to the paper, what is worrying major financial investors is precisely the sudden seriousness with which both Pentagon officials and Congress have begun to consider talk of so-called anomalous (then airborne) unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). 

And what is the danger so feared by high finance? Well, yes, it is precisely the amazing technology repeatedly demonstrated by these extraordinary “flying machines”. Indeed, as revealed in the Financial Times, the opportunity to benefit from superior technology and knowledge sharing, such as the possibility of zero-gravity or “free energy' systems”, in the face of friendly alien visitation, while seemingly tantamount to an injection of global wealth, could in fact wreak enormous havoc, rendering existing fossil fuel resources absolutely useless.

These are all statements that also link us to the 2013 report of the World Economic Forum, a major event for the whole world that takes place every year in DAVOS, Switzerland, where major businessmen, important politicians and exponents of prestigious institutions, from the UN to the ECB to the IMF, meet to discuss the most pressing issues facing the world, including health and the environment, representing one of the most important players in financial decision-making to date.

LINK HERE

Well, even here it was explicitly stated that the probable discovery of alien life would bring down the entire financial and social system.


Important statements that have already resonated around the world, so much so that the first practical applications in the field of investment have begun. In fact, it is worth noting that there are now several Wall Street products that actively take these risks into account.

In fact, in 2019, while the UFO videos of the Pentagon and the US Navy were being published and made official, the company ProcureAM launched the world's first fund dedicated exclusively to investing in the global space economy: the ETF (Exchange Trade Funds), coincidentally called the ETF UFO. Well, the fund in question added UFO risk to its prospectus immediately after the US government published its fateful UFO report in June of that year. From there, of course, others followed, including in Italy and Europe.

Is it any wonder, then, that military contractors like Lockheed Martin are so keen to keep their illegally stored non-human aircraft, with the consent of the US government and without the knowledge of its taxpayers?

THE NEW LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS CONCERNING UAP

Having made this necessary introduction, let's look at what was removed from the Schumer amendment and what was added to the law signed by Biden on 22 December 2023.

Here are the key points removed from the bill:

  • Select a panel of experts with presidential authority, largely independent of the US military and intelligence community, and in some cases civilians, and task them with sifting through government UFO records with the goal of releasing them to the public.
  • Give the government the power to seize any "technology of unknown origin" or even "biological evidence of non-human intelligence" held by private companies.
  • a dozen terms and definitions such as "recovery and retro-engineering of non-human technology".


Instead, these are the key points introduced in the UAP Act:

  • Creation of a government-wide database of all UFO records. All government departments will have 300 days to hand over to the National Archives all their records on UFOs “involving unidentified anomalous phenomena, technologies of unknown origin and non-human intelligence”. However, not all records will be made public. Any agency can keep them secret for reasons of national security or privacy, but it must tell Congress that it is doing so. The US government will collect data on UAP sightings, but it is unclear whether the public will have access to it afterwards. The public may have to wait 25 years to see the fruits of this act, and even then the President may keep them secret. All documents for which a continuing deferment is established will require an unclassified written explanation of the reason for the deferment. The deletion, alteration or modification of UFO documents is prohibited.

BELOW IS AN EXCERPT FROM THE TEXT OF THE LAW, WHICH EXPLAINS IT IN DETAIL:

(a) IDENTIFICATION, ORGANIZATION, AND PREPARATION FOR TRANSMISSION.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, each head of a Government office shall—

(A) identify and organize records in the possession of the Government office or under the control of the Government office relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena; and

(B) prepare such records for transmission to the Archi- vist for inclusion in the Collection.
(2) PROHIBITIONS.—

(A) DESTRUCTION; ALTERATION; MUTILATION.—No un- identified anomalous phenomena record shall be destroyed, altered, or mutilated in any way.

(B) WITHHOLDING; REDACTION; POSTPONEMENT OF DIS- CLOSURE; RECLASSIFICATION.—No unidentified anomalous phenomena record made available or disclosed to the public prior to the date of the enactment of this Act may be withheld, redacted, postponed for public disclosure, or reclassified.

(C) RECORDS CREATED BY NON-FEDERAL PERSONS OR ENTITIES.—No unidentified anomalous phenomena record created by a person or entity outside the Federal Government (excluding names or identities consistent with the requirements of section 1843) shall be withheld, redacted, postponed for public disclosure, or reclassified.

(b) CUSTODY OF UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA RECORDS PENDING REVIEW.—During the review by the heads of Government offices under subsection (c), each head of a Government office shall retain custody of the unidentified anomalous phenomena records of the office for purposes of preservation, security, and efficiency, unless it is a third agency record described in subsection (c)(2)(C).

c) REVIEW BY HEADS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 300 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each head of a Government office shall review, identify, and organize each unidentified anomalous phenomena record in the custody or possession of the office for—

(A) disclosure to the public; and

(B) transmission to the Archivist.

(g) PERIODIC REVIEW OF POSTPONED UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA RECORDS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—All postponed or redacted records shall be reviewed periodically by the originating agency and the Archivist.

(2) REQUIREMENTS.—
(A) PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.—A periodic review under

paragraph (1) shall address the public disclosure of additional unidentified anomalous phenomena records in the Collection under the standards of this subtitle.

(B) UNCLASSIFIED WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF REASON.— All postponed unidentified anomalous phenomena records determined to require continued postponement shall require an unclassified written description of the reason for such continued postponement relevant to these specific records. Such description shall be provided to the Archivist and published in the Federal Register upon determination.

(C) PERIODIC REVIEW; DOWNGRADING AND DESCLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION.—The Archivist shall establish requirements for periodic review of postponed unidentified anomalous phenomena records that shall serve to downgrade and declassify information.

(D) DEADLINE FOR FULL DISCLOSURE.—Each unidenti- fied anomalous phenomena record shall be publicly disclosed in full, and available in the Collection, not later than the date that is 25 years after the date of the first creation of the record by the originating body, unless the President certifies that—

(i) continued postponement is made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations; and

(ii) the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.


  • No UFO programme can be funded unless it is disclosed to Congress. This makes it virtually illegal for the CIA, the military and defence contractors to secretly reverse engineer recovered technology.

BELOW IS AN EXCERPT FROM THE TEXT OF THE LAW, WHICH EXPLAINS IT IN DETAIL:


The conferees agree that this prohibition on spending on unre- ported UAP programs could cover:

(1) Recruiting, employing, training, equipping, and operations of, and providing security for, Government or contractor personnel with a primary, secondary, or contingency mission of capturing, re- covering, and securing unidentified anomalous phenomena craft or pieces and components of such craft;

(2) Analyzing such craft, or pieces or components thereof, in- cluding for the purpose of determining properties, material com- position, method of manufacture, origin, characteristics, usage and application, performance, operational modalities, or reverse engi- neering of such craft or component technology;

(3) Managing and providing security for protecting activities and information relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena from disclosure or compromise;

(4) Actions relating to reverse engineering or replicating un- identified anomalous phenomena technology or performance based on analysis of materials or sensor and observational information associated with unidentified anomalous phenomena;

(5) The development of propulsion technology, or aerospace craft that uses propulsion technology, systems, or subsystems that is based on or derived from or inspired by inspection, analysis, or reverse engineering of recovered unidentified anomalous phe- nomena craft or materials; and

(6) Any aerospace craft that uses propulsion technology other than chemical propellants, solar power, and electric ion thrust.

  • Reference through terminology to “non-human” technology, albeit in a much reduced way. The Schumer amendment referred to this terminology twelve times. In the bill signed by Biden, only once. But this is very significant, because it officially acknowledges the possibility that UFOs belong to non-terrestrial civilisations, and thus the possibility that alien life exists.

BELOW IS AN EXCERPT FROM THE TEXT OF THE LAW, WHICH EXPLAINS IT IN DETAIL:

(G) give precedence of work to—

 (i) the identification, review, and transmission of
 unidentified anomalous phenomena records not already publicly available or disclosed as of the date of the enactment of this Act;

(ii) the identification, review, and transmission of all records that most unambiguously and definitively pertain to unidentified anomalous phenomena, technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligence; 

In short, one step forward, four steps back. The US government really doesn't want to know the truth about UFOs and alien visitation. And no matter how much is said about it, it is not entirely clear whether we will finally have access to the classified documents and what has really happened over the decades. As Senator Schumer himself has said, “It is an outrage the House didn’t work with us in our UAP proposal for a review board. This means declassification of the UAP records will be up to the same entities that have blocked and obfuscated their disclosure for decades.” But apparently, according to Schumer, Rounds and their colleagues, this small victory could still be a starting point for them to continue working towards radical change.

A post from Senator Schumer's X profile

In any case, US President Joe Biden's ratification has started the countdown to the creation of the 'UAP Records Collection'. According to the law, this must now be set up 60 days after the NDAA comes into force, so it will probably be up and running and releasing its first files by the end of February/beginning of March 2024.
The fact is, then, that we will soon be able to know whether the US government is acting in good faith and fulfilling its commitments to transparency on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).

An excellent starting point, according to lawyer Daniel Sheehan, could be the still-classified Project Blue Book documents. Indeed, Sheehan, then General Counsel of the US Jesuit National Headquarters in Washington DC, was granted limited access to the Project Blue Books files in the spring of 1977.

Are we then on the verge of imminent events that will finally bring down the masks and expose decades of cover-up? How far will the US government be willing to go to hide secrets about the UAPs, knowing that it is increasingly being pushed into a corner and will eventually have to forcibly shed light on past misdeeds?

In the end, as Rubio recently noted, "one of these two extraordinary realities is true. Either dozens of high-ranking government officials with top security clearances are insane, or a vast network of UAP informants is slowly revealing the greatest truth in human history”.

Article by Sante Pagano, 2 April 2024


Commenti

Posta un commento