JUANITO JUAN PHOTOGRAPHS TWO SPHERES OF LIGHT AT HOME: Analysis

 

Edited by Pier Giorgio Caria

With the experience of 14 December 2023, Juanito Juan has achieved an incredible hat-trick!

In fact, for the third time in the same year, he had the incredible experience of being able to photograph and film extraterrestrial objects in his home. A unique case in the history of modern Ufology and Extraterrestrial contact.

This third time is as extraordinary as the first two, if not more so. Once again Juanito was able to touch one of these spheres, but this time the shock was even greater because the object, if it was an object at all, was "immaterial", it had no consistency: it was pure light!

But it was not only this that made what Juanito experienced on the night of 14 December 2023 so extraordinary. The other impressive events that took place during the whole time of the event I have explained in detail in the report that you can see at the following link:

I see this episode as a real contact test, projecting the vicissitudes of Juan Manuel Sánchez into a future that truly promises 'things from the other world'. The extraterrestrial agenda, then, is rapidly intensifying as the world situation worsens, and it too is falling faster and faster towards a global catastrophe. 

I leave you with Sante Pagano's analysis of the two photos taken by Juanito Juan before the start of the video shoot, which he broadcast live on the Internet.

Let us hope not, but what is happening on a geopolitical and environmental level certainly does not bode well. We remain steadfast in our work, trying to awaken as many consciences as possible, while waiting for the inevitable 'renovatio' of humanity to take place.

PHOTO ANALYSIS OF 14 DECEMBER 2023 - Juanito Juan

Edited by Sante Pagano

In this report we will examine the following two photographic images taken by Juanito Juan.

METADATA ANALYSIS

The photos contain all the original metadata. Analysis of the metadata shows that they have not been manipulated and that the two photos were taken on 14 December 2023 at 00:47:25 and 00:47:44 respectively.

It was also verified that the creation and modification dates stored in the EXIF data were absolutely compatible with the MAC (Modified, Access, Creation) dates of the system file.

The photos were taken with a “Panasonic DMC-LX10” camera.

A comparison with the metadata normally generated by this camera revealed no suspicious anomalies.

Also present in both photos is another very important piece of data that is virtually impossible to forge: the camera's serial number, which is unique to each device and cannot be added manually.

Furthermore, no use of image editing software was found in the metadata. In fact, no suspicious keywords such as 'Adobe Photoshop' or 'Lightroom' were found within the Software tag.

The thumbnail of the image is also present, a very important factor that I have already examined in detail in the analysis of the photo taken by Juanito Juan on 15 November 2023.

I then carried out a complete analysis of the thumbnail, which revealed no anomalies.

The metadata analysis concludes that the document is genuine and has not been graphically manipulated in post-production.

GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS

Intensity and colour analysis using a histogram

These techniques are very useful for examining images that have been modified, for example, by adjusting the brightness to correct certain shooting or post-processing errors. If the image analysed comes directly from a given device, it is very likely that the histogram of its values will follow a regular course without sudden variations, whereas if it has been processed in such a way as to adjust the intensity of the pixels, it is possible that the histogram will contain artefacts that vary according to the brightness manipulation performed.

The application of operations such as contrast enhancement or image equalisation alters the shape of the histogram in a peculiar way, introducing artefacts such as alternating 'peaks' and 'valleys' or excessive normalisation of 'peaks', resulting in a histogram with an almost straight shape. The analyses did not reveal anything that could be attributed to the presence of graphical manipulations on the documents.

ELA test
No compression differences or abnormal artefacts were found in the ELA test. This means that no post-production digital alterations have been made.

ICC profile analysis (International Colour Consortium)
An ICC profile is a file that describes how to correctly convert image files from one colour space to another. ICC profiles make it possible to obtain the correct colours for images. For example, an ICC profile can be selected to correctly display images that are to be printed on a computer monitor. This profile allows the image to be converted to a different colour space and ensures that the colours are displayed correctly online. It is often the case that when an image is passed through an editing application such as Photoshop, it is modified or deleted.

This action can be highlighted by this type of analysis, which often provides a date when the profile was “embedded”.

 

In both documents, the ICC profile is present and has not been altered.

Hidden pixel analysis
This analysis can detect whether an image has passed through a programmed image editing application.
 
Graphics applications do not always display every pixel of an image; this is common with PNG images using transparency (an alpha channel) and with JPEG cropping. Although hidden pixels are not displayed when the image is rendered, they still contain colour values.
 
The JPEG algorithm segments the image into independent 8×8 grids. But what happens if the rendered JPEG dimensions do not match the grid? For example, if the image size is 203×250? In fact, neither 203 nor 250 is divisible by 8. With JPEG encoding, the actual encoded image expands to the next largest 8×8 limit, and pixels outside the visible range are dropped during rendering. If the image is 203×250, the actual encoded image will be 208×256 pixels and the remaining 5 pixels at the right edge and 6 pixels at the bottom will be dropped.
 
I also noticed from this analysis that no passes were made through editing applications such as Photoshop or Gimp.

Pixel and edge analysis

The composition of the pixels along the edges shows no sharp breaks, but a certain continuity: this indicates good graphic coherence. We can even see that there are some pixels inside the edges that are completely similar to those outside the edges. The absolute consistency of the pixels in the objects as well as in the different landmarks confirms the authenticity of the two documents.

 

OBSERVATIONAL ANALYSIS OF LIGHT

We can observe the semicircular reflection of the spheres directly on the floor. It is interesting to note that the two spheres emit light mainly from their part facing the observer: this does not, of course, exclude the possibility that they are capable of producing light from any point of their structure. In fact, both in the 6 December video and in these photographs, the area of space behind the spheres is much less illuminated than the area in front of them. If we look at what appears to be the sphere closest to Juanito (sphere 1) (as Juanito himself confirms in the video taken that evening), we can see that it only or mainly projects light from the front of its own structure, and that the shadow on the floor (C) is not due to the presence of the arch, since we also have other lines of demarcation on the side walls (A) and on the ceiling (B).

These two reflections are also slightly curved, showing that they also come from a spherical or curved light source.

But it is in the second photo that an even more important detail appears, namely the presence of a second semicircular reflection on the ground (D), which is further back than the other (C), confirming two very important points:

·       “sphere 2” is further back than the other;
·       also “sphere 2” projects light mainly or only from its front surface.

In the last two images, to which special filters have been applied, this detail (D) can be seen more clearly.

This is even more obvious when we look at the video taken by Juanito Juan on the same evening. Here is a frame that highlights it.

The purpose of this analysis is also very useful for us to be able to define some structural and technical-functional aspects of such extraordinary technological apparatuses.

Latest observational assessments of light

The light projected by the spheres appears to be natural, i.e. not a graphically added light source. This can be deduced from the reflections scattered around the room, which show a consistent response to the light source. In particular, many of the really important details were found to be particularly difficult to reproduce graphically.

The image below highlights the various key reflections found through observational analysis.

LIGHT ANALYSIS BY GRAPHICAL TEST

Level scanning analysis

This analysis, which uses an algorithm to search for light sources in the environment, highlights the main light sources and reflections that are most noticeable. The test confirms the results of the above observational analysis.

Luminance gradient analysis
According to the luminance gradient (figure 1), light is distributed consistently in the room. The elements and areas within it collect the right amount of light emitted by the light sources, which are better distributed in the most exposed and nearby areas. This can best be seen in the differentiated colour analysis performed through the study of the main component (figure 2).

SEARCH FOR SUSPENSION WIRES AND STRUCTURES

From the observations and analyses carried out, there is no structure such as a mobile or pedestal that keeps the spheres in suspension. Similarly, there is no wire holding the spheres in suspension.

CONCLUSION

From the analyses, tests and observations carried out, it appears that the two documents are genuine. Furthermore, no graphic alterations have been detected.

Sante Pagano, 23 January 2024